<italic style="font-style: italic">Aeriscardovia aeriphila</italic>对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化功能、免疫应答和肠道菌群的影响

Muhammad Zahid FAROOQ; 王新锴; 晏向华

doi:10.1631/jzus.B2200621

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Aeriscardovia aeriphila对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化功能、免疫应答和肠道菌群的影响

Scan for full text

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

Research Article | Updated：2023-11-15

Aeriscardovia aeriphila对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化功能、免疫应答和肠道菌群的影响
Effects of Aeriscardovia aeriphila on growth performance, antioxidant functions, immune responses, and gut microbiota in broiler chickens
浙江大学学报（英文版）（B辑：生物医学和生物技术） 2023年24卷第11期页码：1014-1026
Affiliations：

1.National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2.Department of Animal Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Jhang Campus), Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Funds：

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31925037)
DOI：10.1631/jzus.B2200621
中图分类号：
CSTR：

Muhammad Zahid FAROOQ,王新锴,晏向华.,Aeriscardovia aeriphila对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化功能、免疫应答和肠道菌群的影响[J].浙江大学学报（英文版）（B辑：生物医学和生物技术）,2023,24(11):1014-1026.

Muhammad Zahid FAROOQ, Xinkai WANG, Xianghua YAN. Effects of Aeriscardovia aeriphila on growth performance, antioxidant functions, immune responses, and gut microbiota in broiler chickens[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2023,24(11):1014-1026.
Muhammad Zahid FAROOQ,王新锴,晏向华.,Aeriscardovia aeriphila对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化功能、免疫应答和肠道菌群的影响[J].浙江大学学报（英文版）（B辑：生物医学和生物技术）,2023,24(11):1014-1026. DOI： 10.1631/jzus.B2200621.

Muhammad Zahid FAROOQ, Xinkai WANG, Xianghua YAN. Effects of Aeriscardovia aeriphila on growth performance, antioxidant functions, immune responses, and gut microbiota in broiler chickens[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2023,24(11):1014-1026. DOI： 10.1631/jzus.B2200621.

摘要

Aeriscardovia aeriphila,，又名,Bifidobacterium aerophilum,，是从猪盲肠内容物中分离出的一种双歧杆菌。,A. aeriphila,在预防肠道感染、降低胆固醇水平和刺激免疫系统方面具有重要作用。本研究首先从肉鸡十二指肠肠道内容物中分离出一株菌，经16S 测序鉴定为 ,A. aeriphila,，然后我们评估了,A. aeriphila,对商用肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化功能、免疫功能和肠道菌群的影响。实验对21日龄的实验鸡进行了为期3周的灌服,A. aeriphila,（1×10,9, CFU/mL）处理。研究结果显示：,A. aeriphila,处理显著增加了鸡的平均日增重，降低了饲料转化率（,P,<,0.001）。,A. aeriphila,处理后，血清生长激素（GH）和胰岛素样生长因子1（IGF-1）水平显著升高（,P,<,0.05）。,A. aeriphila,处理降低了血尿素氮和天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶水平，增加了血糖和肌酐水平。同时，,A. aeriphila,处理显著提高了血清中抗氧化酶水平（包括过氧化氢酶（,P,<,0.01）、超氧化物歧化酶（,P,<,0.001）和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶（,P,<,0.05））及总抗氧化能力（,P,<,0.05）。,A. aeriphila,处理显著增加了血清免疫球蛋白A（IgA）（,P,<,0.05）、IgG（,P,<,0.01）、IgM（,P,<,0.05）、白细胞介素-1（IL-1）（,P,<,0.05）、IL-4（,P,<,0.05）和IL-10（,P,<,0.05）的水平。与对照组相比，,A. aeriphila,组肉鸡在十二指肠（,P,<,0.01）、空肠（,P,<,0.001）和盲肠（,P,<,0.001）中的分泌型免疫球蛋白A（SIgA）水平显著提高。在肠道黏膜（包括十二指肠、空肠和盲肠）中，,A. aeriphila,组鸡的,IL-10,（,P,<,0.05）、,IL-4,（,P,<,0.001）和,NF-κB,（,P,<,0.001）信使RNA（mRNA）相对表达水平高于对照组。肠道微生物门水平分析显示，两组的差异菌群主要是厚壁菌门，其次是拟杆菌门。此外，,A. aeriphila,可提高肠道中,Phascolarctobacterium,和,Barnesiella,的丰度。综上所述，灌服,A. aeriphila,可改善肉鸡的生长性能、血清抗氧化能力、免疫调节和肠道健康。因此，本研究结果可以为,A. aeriphila,在家禽生产中的应用提供理论依据。

Abstract

Aeriscardovia aeriphila, also known as ,Bifidobacterium aerophilum, was first isolated from the caecal contents of pigs and the faeces of cotton-top tamarin. ,Bifidobacterium, species play important roles in preventing intestinal infections, decreasing cholesterol levels, and stimulating the immune system. In this study, we isolated a strain of bacteria from the duodenal contents of broiler chickens, which was identified as ,A. aeriphila, and then evaluated the effects of ,A. aeriphila, on growth performance, antioxidant functions, immune functions, and gut microbiota in commercial broiler chickens. Chickens were orally gavaged with ,A. aeriphila, (1×10,9, CFU/mL) for 21 d. The results showed that ,A. aeriphila, treatment significantly increased the average daily gain and reduced the feed conversion ratio (,P,<,0.001). The levels of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) were significantly increased following ,A. aeriphila, treatment (,P,<,0.05). Blood urea nitrogen and aspartate aminotransferase levels were decreased, whereas glucose and creatinine levels increased as a result of ,A. aeriphila, treatment. Furthermore, the levels of serum antioxidant enzymes, including catalase (,P,<,0.01), superoxide dismutase (,P,<,0.001), and glutathione peroxidase (,P,<,0.05), and total antioxidant capacity (,P,<,0.05) were enhanced following ,A. aeriphila, treatment. ,A. aeriphila, treatment significantly increased the levels of serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) (,P,<,0.05), IgG (,P,<,0.01), IgM (,P,<,0.05), interleukin-1 (IL-1) (,P,<,0.05), IL-4 (,P,<,0.05), and IL-10 (,P,<,0.05). The broiler chickens in the ,A. aeriphila, group had higher secretory IgA (SIgA) levels in the duodenum (,P,<,0.01), jejunum (,P,<,0.001), and cecum (,P,<,0.001) than those in the control group. The messenger RNA (mRNA) relative expression levels of ,IL-10 ,(,P,<,0.05) and ,IL-4, (,P,<,0.001) in the intestinal mucosa of chickens were increased, while nuclear factor-‍κB (,NF,‍,-,‍,κB,) (,P,<,0.001) expression was decreased in the ,A. aeriphila, group compared to the control group. Phylum-level analysis revealed Firmicutes as the main phylum, followed by Bacteroidetes, in both groups. The data also found that ,Phascolarctobacterium ,and ,Barnesiella, were increased in ,A. aeriphila,-treated group. In conclusion, oral administration of ,A. aeriphila, could improve the growth performance, serum antioxidant capacity, immune modulation, and gut health of broilers. Our findings may provide important information for the application of ,A. aeriphila ,in poultry production.

关键词

鸡Aeriscardovia aeriphila肠道健康菌群免疫功能

Keywords

ChickenAeriscardovia aeriphilaGut healthMicrobiomeImmune function

references

Abdulrahim SM, Haddadin MSY, Hashlamoun EAR, et al., 1996. The influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus and bacitracin on layer performance of chickens and cholesterol content of plasma and egg yolk. Br Poultry Sci, 37(2):341-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417865https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417865

Adalsteinsdottir SA, Magnusdottir OK, Halldorsson TI, et al., 2018. Towards an individualized nutrition treatment: role of the gastrointestinal microbiome in the interplay between diet and obesity. Curr Obes Rep, 7(4):289-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-018-0321-zhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-018-0321-z

Alaqaby ARA, Glaskovich AA, Kapitonova EA, et al., 2014. Study the effect of using probiotic (vetlactoflorum) on some of biochemical and immunological parameters of broiler chickens. Basrah J Vet Res, 13(1):166-179. https://doi.org/10.33762/bvetr.2014.88137https://doi.org/10.33762/bvetr.2014.88137

Bader J, Albin A, Stahl U, 2012. Spore-forming bacteria and their utilisation as probiotics. Benefic Microbes, 3(1):67-75. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2011.0039https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2011.0039

Bai SP, Wu AM, Ding XM, et al., 2013. Effects of probiotic-supplemented diets on growth performance and intestinal immune characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult Sci, 92(3):663-670. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02813https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02813

Beckman BR, Larsen DA, Moriyama S, et al., 1998. Insulin-like growth factor-I and environmental modulation of growth during smoltification of spring chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Gen Comp Endocrinol, 109(3):325-335. https://doi.org/10.1006/gcen.1997.7036https://doi.org/10.1006/gcen.1997.7036

Bian XF, Wallstrom G, Davis A, et al., 2016. Immunoproteomic profiling of antiviral antibodies in new-onset type 1 diabetes using protein arrays. Diabetes, 65(1):285-296. https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-0179https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-0179

Birbrair A, Zhang T, Wang ZM, et al., 2013. Role of pericytes in skeletal muscle regeneration and fat accumulation. Stem Cells Dev, 22(16):2298-2314. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2012.0647https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2012.0647

Buntyn JO, Schmidt TB, Nisbet DJ, et al., 2016. The role of direct-fed microbials in conventional livestock production. Annu Rev Anim Biosci, 4:335-355. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111123https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111123

Cao GT, Dai B, Wang KL, et al., 2019. Bacillus licheniformis, a potential probiotic, inhibits obesity by modulating colonic microflora in C57BL/6J mice model. J Appl Microbiol, 127(3):880-888. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14352https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14352

Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al., 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods, 7(5):335-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303

Chen YC, Yu YH, 2020. Bacillus licheniformis-fermented products improve growth performance and the fecal microbiota community in broilers. Poult Sci, 99(3):‍1432-1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.061https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.061

Cheng GY, Hao HH, Xie SY, et al., 2014. Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry? Front Microbiol, 5:217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217

Das HK, Medhi AK, Islam M, 2005. Effect of probiotics on certain blood parameters and carcass characteristics of broiler chicken. Indian J Poult Sci, 40(1):83-86. https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2022.225224https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2022.225224

de Boever S, Vangestel C, de Backer P, et al., 2008. Identification and validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for gene expression in an intravenous LPS inflammation model in chickens. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 122(3-4):312-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.12.002https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.12.002

Djouvinov D, Boicheva S, Simeonova T, et al., 2005. Effect of feeding Lactina® probiotic on performance, some blood parameters and caecal microflora of mule ducklings. Trakia J Sci, 3(2):22-28.

Edgar RC, 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods, 10(10):996-998. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604

Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, et al., 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics, 27(16):2194-2200. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381

Ferrario C, Milani C, Mancabelli L, et al., 2016. Modulation of the eps-ome transcription of Bifidobacteria through simulation of human intestinal environment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 92(4):fiw056. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw056https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw056

García-Cayuela T, Korany AM, Bustos I, et al., 2014. Adhesion abilities of dairy Lactobacillus plantarum strains showing an aggregation phenotype. Food Res Int, 57:44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.010https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.010

Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, et al., 2014. Expert consensus document: the international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11(8):506-514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66

Hirayama H, Suzuki Y, Abe M, et al., 2011. Methylothermus subterraneus sp. Nov., a moderately thermophilic methanotroph isolated from a terrestrial subsurface hot aquifer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 61(Pt 11):2646-2653. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.028092-0https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.028092-0

Khalique A, Zeng D, Shoaib M, et al., 2020. Probiotics mitigating subclinical necrotic enteritis (SNE) as potential alternatives to antibiotics in poultry. AMB Express, 10:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-00989-6https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-00989-6

Khan S, Roberts J, Wu SB, 2017. Reference gene selection for gene expression study in shell gland and spleen of laying hens challenged with infectious bronchitis virus. Sci Rep, 7:14271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14693-2https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14693-2

Lammers A, Wieland WH, Kruijt L, et al., 2010. Successive immunoglobulin and cytokine expression in the small intestine of juvenile chicken. Dev Comp Immunol, 34(12):1254-1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2010.07.001https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2010.07.001

Lin LH, Ke FR, Zhan TT, et al., 2014. Effects of Bacillus coagulans on performance, serum biochemical indices and antioxidant function of yellow broilers. Chin J Anim Nutr, 26(12):3806-3813 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.12.034https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.12.034

Liu JB, Yan HL, Zhang Y, et al., 2020. Effects of stale maize on growth performance, immunity, intestinal morphology and antioxidant capacity in broilers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 33(4):605-614. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0224https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0224

Liu SQ, Wang LY, Liu GH, et al., 2018. Leucine alters immunoglobulin a secretion and inflammatory cytokine expression induced by lipopolysaccharide via the nuclear factor‍-‍κB pathway in intestine of chicken embryos. Animal, 12(9):1903-1911. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003342https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003342

Liu X, Li SR, Wang ZY, et al., 2018. Effects of dietary lipids and clostridium butyricum on chicken volatile flavour compounds. Indian J Anim Res, 52(8):1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.6998https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.6998

Liu XL, Yan H, Lv L, et al., 2012. Growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus licheniformis in drinking water. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 25(5):682-689. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11334https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11334

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD, 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the $2^{- ∆ ∆ C_{T}}$ https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=49863394&type=https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=49863393&type=6.434666632.53999996 method. Methods, 25(4):402-408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262

Livingston ML, Cowieson AJ, Crespo R, et al., 2020. Effect of broiler genetics, age, and gender on performance and blood chemistry. Heliyon, 6(7):e04400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04400https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04400

Lokapirnasari WP, al Arif A, Soeharsono S, et al., 2019. Improves in external and internal egg quality of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) by giving lactic acid bacteria as alternative antibiotic growth promoter. Iran J Microbiol, 11(5):406-411. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v11i5.1959https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v11i5.1959

Louis P, Flint HJ, 2009. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 294(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.xhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x

Magoč T, Salzberg SL, 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics, 27(21):2957-2963. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507

Massacci FR, Lovito C, Tofani S, et al., 2019. Dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii CNCM I-1079 positively affects performance and intestinal ecosystem in broilers during a Campylobacter jejuni infection. Microorganisms, 7(12):596. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120596https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120596

Mehdi Y, Létourneau-Montminy MP, Gaucher ML, et al., 2018. Use of antibiotics in broiler production: global impacts and alternatives. Anim Nutr, 4(2):170-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.002https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.002

Michaelidou K, Tzovaras A, Missitzis I, et al., 2013. The expression of the CEACAM19 gene, a novel member of the CEA family, is associated with breast cancer progression. Int J Oncol, 42(5):1770-1777. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.1860https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.1860

Mohan B, Kadirvel R, Bhaskaran M, et al., 1995. Effect of probiotic supplementation on serum/yolk cholesterol and on egg shell thickness in layers. Br Poultry Sci, 36(5):799-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417824https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417824

Mohan B, Kadirvel R, Natarajan A, et al., 1996. Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth, nitrogen utilisation and serum cholesterol in broilers. Br Poultry Sci, 37(2):‍395-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417870https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417870

Panda AK, Raju MVLN, Rama RSV, et al., 2005. The influence of supplementation of Lactobacillus sporogenes on the performance of broilers. Indian J Anim Nutr, 22(1):37-40. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.235https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.235

Panda AK, Rao SVR, Raju MVLN, et al., 2006. Dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus sporogenes on performance and serum biochemico-lipid profile of broiler chickens. J Poult Sci, 43(3):235-240. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.235https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.235

Russell DA, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, et al., 2011. Metabolic activities and probiotic potential of bifidobacteria. Int J Food Microbiol, 149(1):88-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.06.003https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.06.003

Scanes CG, 2009. Perspectives on the endocrinology of poultry growth and metabolism. Gen Comp Endocrinol, 163(1-2):24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.013https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.013

Surai PF, Kochish II, Fisinin VI, 2017. Antioxidant systems in poultry biology: nutritional modulation of vitagenes. Eur Poult Sci, 81:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2017.214https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2017.214

Thapa BR, Walia A, 2007. Liver function tests and their interpretation. Indian J Pediatr, 74(7):663-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0118-7https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0118-7

Vital M, Howe AC, Tiedje JM, 2014. Revealing the bacterial butyrate synthesis pathways by analyzing (meta) genomic data. mBio, 5(2):e00889-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00889-14https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00889-14

Wang X., Hu Y., Zhu X, et al., 2023. Bacteroides-derived isovaleric acid enhances mucosal immunity by facilitating intestinal IgA response in broilers. J Animal Sci Biotechnol, 14:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00807-yhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00807-y

Zheng JS, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, et al., 2020. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 70(4):‍2782-2858. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107

浏览量

Downloads

CSCD

工具集

关联资源

Development and validation of novel inflammatory response-related gene signature for sepsis prognosis

Aeriscardovia aeriphila对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化功能、免疫应答和肠道菌群的影响

Effects of Aeriscardovia aeriphila on growth performance, antioxidant functions, immune responses, and gut microbiota in broiler chickens

DOI：10.1631/jzus.B2200621

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Keywords

references