Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using traditional laparoscopic instruments: a report of thirty-six cases

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using traditional laparoscopic instruments: a report of thirty-six cases first-author †E-mail:cao@zju.edu.cn †E-mail:cao@zju.edu.cn cao@zju.edu.cn Department of Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China Department of Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China Objective: 2 To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the operation of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TSPLC) by traditional laparoscopic instruments and summarize the initial experience. Methods: 2 Sixty subjects with cholelithiasis were divided into two groups. One group (36 cases) underwent TSPLC and the control group (24 cases) underwent traditional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Postoperative complications were observed and operation time, hospital days, visual analogue scale (VAS) after 6 and 24 h of operation, and subject satisfaction score were measured. Results: 2 TSPLC and traditional LC were performed successfully in the two groups. The operation time in the TSPLC group was significantly longer than that in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay and VAS between the TSPLC and control groups. The subject satisfaction score in the TSPLC group was 91.2, significantly higher than that in the control group ( P < 0.01). All subjects recovered from the operation and no postoperative complication occurred during the period of two weeks after operation. Conclusions: 2 TSPLC is a feasible and safe method for cholecystectomy, although it may be more time-consuming. However, it is welcomed by patients who are more concerned with cosmetic outcomes. Future studies are needed to confirm its disadvantages and contraindications. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy Minimally invasive surgery Traditional laparoscopic instruments Introduction 1 Since the first case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was reported by Mouret ( 1996 1996 ), a French gynecologist in 1987, LC has become the preferred form of cholecystectomy. In the 21st century, with the development of minimally invasive surgeries and their acceptance by many patients interested in the cosmetic outcomes, single-port laparoscopic technique (Tacchino et al., 2009 2009 ) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (Pearl and Ponsky, 2008 2008 ) are advancing rapidly on the basis of traditional endoscopic technique. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TSPLC) has been accepted by many surgeons and patients (Raman et al., 2008 2008 ). The first case of TSPLC was reported in 1997 by Navarra et al. ( 1997 1997 ). In the early years, TSPLC developed slowly because of technical and instrumental limitations. In recent years, it has developed rapidly, and has been performed by more and more surgeons. We have performed the operation since 2008. In this article, we report our initial experience of TSPLC performed entirely by common laparoscopic instruments, and we have evaluated the safety and feasibility of the operation. Materials and methods 1 Subjects 2 Between December 2008 and October 2010, 60 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were hospitalized. The 60 subjects were divided into two groups according to patient desires after particular preoperative education of TSPLC and traditional LC. Thirty six subjects decided to undergo TSPLC and were classified to the TSPLC group, the others (24), undergoing traditional LC, were classified to the control group. All subjects were selected strictly and had no other disease history such as heart disease, pneumonia, gastroenteritis, or hepatitis. Operative history of upper abdominal operation, body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m 2 , acute cholecystitis, suspicion of malignancy, and the presence of a cystic duct stone were considered contraindications to TSPLC (Hirano et al., 2010 2010 ). Potential subjects with contraindications were also excluded from the study. The average ages of the TSPLC and control groups were 46.5 and 48.3 years, respectively. There were 17 females in the TSPLC group and 10 females in the control group. No statistically significant difference in age or sex was found between the two groups. Careful preoperative examinations, such as abdominal ultrasonography, blood tests, and electrocardiogram, were performed to exclude contraindications. Before each operation, the subjects were fully informed about risks of operation and provided informed consent. Postoperative complications were observed (e.g., bleeding, biliary leak, bile duct injury, port site infection, port hernia, and spilled gallstones). Operation time, hospital days, visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–10 scores) (Boonstra et al., 2008 2008 ) after 6 and 24 h of operation, and subject satisfaction score (0–100) (Tomlinson and Ko, 2006 2006 ) were also measured in the perioperative period. All operations were performed by the same surgical team. All subjects were observed and recorded by another research team. Statistical analysis 2 Data analysis was performed by software of SPSS 10.0. All data were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) and comparisons between groups were made by analysis of variance (ANOVA). P value < 0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Operation procedure 2 In this study, all operations were accomplished by common laparoscopic instruments listed in Table 1 1 . Instrument Company (country)  Trocar (10 and 5 mm) STORZ (Germany)  Electric coagulating hook STORZ (Germany)  Suction apparatus STORZ (Germany)  Absorbable clip STORZ (Germany)  Laparoscope (10 and 5 mm) STORZ (Germany)  Laparoscopic scissors WOLF (Germany)  Elastic separating pliers WOLF (Germany)  Clip applier WOLF (Germany)  Tongs type grab WOLF (Germany) The subjects were placed on the operating table in supine position and legs apart. One surgeon, located between subject’s legs, and the assistant stood on the right side of the subject. A 2.0–2.5 cm periumbilical incision was made for port access, and then CO 2 pneumoperitoneum with pressure between 12 to 14 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) was set up by open Hasson’s method. A 10-mm laparoscope was inserted into the abdominal cavity through the 10-mm trocar (for the last eight subjects, we use 5-mm laparoscope and 5-mm trocar). Additional 5- and 10-mm trocars were inserted into the same incision, but separated at the peritoneum, to avoid CO 2 gas leak (Fig. 1 1 ). The 10-mm trocar was the major manipulating port. Retrograde LC was performed as per three-port LC. The cystic duct and artery were all identified before the cystic duct was clipped, to avoid bile duct injury (Fig. 2 2 ). Careful hemostasis was necessary after the gallbladder was separated from the cholecystic bed. Finally, the gallbladder specimen was removed through the transumbilical incision. Results 1 TSPLC was successfully performed in all 36 subjects with cholelithiasis and no case was transferred to three-port LC. The other 24 patients also successfully underwent three-port LC. The operation time in the TSPLC group was significantly longer than that in the control group (56.0 min vs. 36.7 min, P < 0.01; Table 2 2 ). In the last 10 subjects of the TSPLC group, however, the mean operation time was 37.4 min (Table 3 3 ), this having decreased obviously from the initial cases (Fig. 3 3 ). There was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay or VAS between the TSPLC and control groups (Table 2 2 ). The subject satisfaction score in the TSPLC group was 91.2, significantly higher than that in the control group ( P < 0.01; Table 2 2 ). In the TSPLC group, hospital stay, VAS, and satisfaction score showed no statistically difference between the first 26 cases and the last 10 cases (Table 3 3 ). All patients recovered from the operation and no postoperative complication occurred within two weeks after operation. 2 Group 2 Operation time (min) 2 Hospital day (d) 2 VAS score (1–10) 2 Subject satisfaction score (1–100) 6 h 24 h TSPLC ( n =36) 56.0±16.70 2.6±0.42 5.1±2.21 2.3±0.68 91.2±6.90 Control ( n =24) 36.7±6.00 2.4±0.51 4.4±1.92 2.1±0.51 88.5±5.30 6 F 430 1.26 3.37 0.94 16.80 P 0 0.27 0.07 0.34 0 2 Case 2 Operation time (min) 2 Hospital day (d) 2 VAS score (1–10) 2 Subject satisfaction score (1–100) 6 h 24 h First 26 cases 63.2±14.10 2.6±0.50 5.4±2.21 2.3±0.72 91.3±6.83 Last 10 cases 37.4±2.95 2.6±0.52 4.5±1.80 2.3±0.48 90.9±7.31 6 F 414 0.01 2.66 0.01 0.20 P 0 0.84 0.11 0.92 0.68 Discussion 1 Since the first case of TSPLC was reported in 1997, many surgeons have attempted to perform single-incision laparoscopic operation. In the early years, only a few reports were issued in journals (Navarra et al., 1997 1997 ) and most surgeons did not think such a “difficult” operation, other than providing scar reduction, would be beneficial for patients. In recent years, after scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy was widely performed in many medical centers, the concept of a minimally invasive esthetic operation had been accepted by many surgeons, because it was welcomed by many patients (Snissarenko et al., 2009 2009 ). More surgeons found that TSPLC was not as difficult as before with the development of laparoscopic technology and instrument upgrades (Romanelli et al., 2008 2008 ; 2010 2010 ). Today, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic cholecystectomy, such as endoscopic cholecystectomy through gastric and vaginal access, has been successfully performed in some hospitals (Pearl and Ponsky, 2008 2008 ). TSPLC has no visible scar on the body (Bucher et al., 2009 2009 ). In the early period of TSPLC use, laparoscopic surgeons were mainly confronted with the difficulty of how to abate interactions between working apparatuses when they were operating through three trocars in the same incision (Navarra et al., 1997 1997 ; Rivas et al., 2010 2010 ). Three methods could be adopted to solve the problem: (1) Hanging the cholecystic bottom to the right subcostal abdominal wall by one to three percutaneous sutures could provide adequate working room and the assistant trocar can be moved from the transumbilical incision (Philipp et al., 2009 2009 ); (2) Using a Triport trocar or self-made apparatus, such as sterile gloves (Romanelli et al., 2008 2008 ); (3) Using articulating instruments (Podolsky et al., 2009 2009 ), such as flexible-tip laparoscope (Elazary et al., 2009 2009 ) and articulating grasper. This reduces operative difficulty, but increases operation fees. In our study, all three trocars were inserted through a 2.0–2.5 cm incision and entered into abdominal cavity at different sites of peritoneum to avoid CO 2 gas leak. Perfect positions of the three trocars would abate interactions between the apparatuses. A triangular placement of three trocars is the most consistent arrangement such that laparoscope locates at the apex and two working ports locate at two hemline endpoints of the triangle. The remaining interaction was overcome by the surgeon’s adroit skill. Thirty-six cases of TSPLC were successfully performed without transference to three-port LC, and it was feasible in practice. As experience increases, operation time becomes as short as that of traditional LC. In this study, 36 cases of TSPLC were successfully performed without postoperative complication such as incisional hernia or wound infection. TSPLC showed the same safety as traditional LC. The TSPLC group achieved a high VAS score after a 6-h operation compared to the control group, perhaps because of the longer operation time and larger umbilicus incision. Following 24 h from the operation, the VAS score showed no statistically significant difference. The subject satisfaction score in the TSPLC group was higher than that in the control group, which indicated that TSPLC was attractive to most patients, especially to young women. Although all TSPLCs were successfully performed, further research is still needed to solve many operative difficulties. In TSPLC, all three trocars entered into the abdominal cavity from the same incision, and it was difficult to work from two directions as in traditional LC. Hanging the gallbladder’s bottom to the right subcostal abdominal wall was helpful to expose the neck of the gallbladder (Ponsky, 2009 2009 ). The mobile range of the laparoscopic apparatus was also restricted by other trocars and the operating field was extremely narrow. Thus, concurrent manipulations were very important and necessary to work effectively and to avoid having the apparatus suddenly disappear from view. The surgeon requires considerable experience with laparoscopic operations to overcome these difficulties. Conclusions 1 TSPLC with common laparoscopic instruments was feasible and safe. It may need more time to complete the operation in the early period. However, it is welcomed by the patients who have concerns about cosmetic effects of surgery. TSPLC is an ideal alternative to traditional LC. Of course, future studies are needed to confirm its disadvantages and contraindications. References AM Boonstra , HR Schiphorst Preuper , MF Reneman . Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain . Int J Rehabil Res , 2008 . 31 ( 2 ): 165 - 169 . 18467932 DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93 http://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93 . Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain P Bucher , F Pugin , N Buchs , S Ostermann , F Charara , P Morel . Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video) . World J Surg , 2009 . 33 ( 5 ): 1015 - 1019 . 19116734 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9874-4 http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9874-4 . Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video) R Elazary , A Khalaileh , G Zamir , M Har-Lev , G Almogy , AI Rivkind , Y Mintz . Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: abridge to NOTES or the final form? . Surg Endosc , 2009 . 23 ( 5 ): 969 - 972 . 19118419 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0289-y http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0289-y . Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: abridge to NOTES or the final form? Y Hirano , T Watanabe , T Uchida , S Yoshida , K Tawaraya , H Kato , O Hosokawa . Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single institution experience and literature review . World J Gastroenterol , 2010 . 16 ( 2 ): 270 - 274 . 20066749 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i2.270 http://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i2.270 . Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single institution experience and literature review P Mouret . How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy . Ann Acad Med Singapore , 1996 . 25 ( 5 ): 744 - 747 . 8924020 . How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy G Navarra , E Pozza , S Occhionorelli , P Carcoforo , I Donini . One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy . Br J Surg , 1997 . 84 ( 5 ): 695 9171771 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02586.x http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02586.x . One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy JP Pearl , JL Ponsky . Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review . J Gastrointest Surg , 2008 . 12 ( 7 ): 1293 - 1300 . 18057995 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0424-4 http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0424-4 . Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review SR Philipp , BW Miedema , K Thaler . Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard . J Am Coll Surg , 2009 . 209 ( 5 ): 632 - 637 . 19854405 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.020 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.020 . Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard ER Podolsky , SJ Rottman , H Poblete , SA King , PG Curcillo . Single port access (SPA™) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach . J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech , 2009 . 19 ( 2 ): 219 - 222 . DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0275 http://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2008.0275 . Single port access (SPA™) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach TA Ponsky . Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques . J Am Coll Surg , 2009 . 209 ( 5 ): e1 - e6 . 19854392 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.025 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.025 . Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques JD Raman , JA Cadeddu , P Rao , A Rane . Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: initial urological experience and comparison with natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery . BJU Int , 2008 . 101 ( 12 ): 1493 - 1496 . 18325059 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07586.x http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07586.x . Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: initial urological experience and comparison with natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery H Rivas , E Varela , D Scott . Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients . Surg Endosc , 2010 . 24 ( 6 ): 1403 - 1412 . 20035355 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0786-7 http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0786-7 . Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients JR Romanelli , L Mark , PA Omotosho . Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the TriPort system: a case report . Surg Innov , 2008 . 15 ( 3 ): 223 - 228 . 18757383 DOI: 10.1177/1553350608322700 http://doi.org/10.1177/1553350608322700 . Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the TriPort system: a case report JR Romanelli , TB3rd Roshek , DC Lynn , DB Earle . Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience . Surg Endosc , 2010 . 24 ( 6 ): 1374 - 1379 . 20039073 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0781-z http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0781-z . Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience EP Snissarenko , GH Kima , AAJr Simental , JE Zwart , DM Ransbarger , PD Kim . Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a retrospective study over two years of experience . Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg , 2009 . 141 ( 1 ): 29 - 33 . 19559954 DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.015 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.015 . Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a retrospective study over two years of experience R Tacchino , F Greco , D Matera . Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar . Surg Endosc , 2009 . 23 ( 4 ): 896 - 899 . 18815836 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0147-y http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0147-y . Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar JS Tomlinson , CY Ko . Patient satisfaction: an increasingly important measure of quality . Ann Surg Oncol , 2006 . 13 ( 6 ): 764 - 765 . 16614874 DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2006.01.904 http://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.01.904 . Patient satisfaction: an increasingly important measure of quality 10.1631/jzus.B1000384 2010-11-05 2011-09-01 2011-03-08 2022-01-05 Copyright © Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 2011 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine and Biotechnology) 10 12